The Truth About “Pennies on the Dollar” IRS Settlements
I’m going to tell you a story about a business owner I’ll call Mark. He had built a small but stable company, employed a handful of people, and, for most of his career, did exactly what the IRS expects—filed his returns, made his deposits, and treated payroll taxes as a priority rather than an afterthought.
Then a serious medical issue intervened.
What began as a health scare turned into surgery, recovery time, and months of uncertainty. While Mark was focused on getting well enough to work again, his business continued to operate, his employees still needed to be paid, and cash flow began to tighten in ways that don’t show up neatly on financial statements. Faced with impossible choices, he did what many business owners do in a crisis: he paid his employees and vendors first and told himself he would catch up on the payroll tax deposits once things stabilized.
He didn’t.
By the time his health improved, Mark was facing a substantial payroll tax liability, compounded by penalties and interest, and now accompanied by increasingly serious notices from the IRS. The debt felt overwhelming, and the situation felt personal—not reckless or dishonest, but the result of circumstances he never anticipated.
That was when the mail started arriving.
Among the envelopes was a letter from a tax resolution company, professionally designed and carefully worded, promising relief and a “fresh start.” It suggested that he might qualify to settle his IRS debt for pennies on the dollar. It framed his medical hardship as a key factor. It implied that the size of his debt made him a strong candidate.
We’ve all seen versions of these ads. They offer certainty in moments that feel anything but certain.
Mark called the number.
After a brief intake process and a sizable retainer, he was told that an Offer in Compromise would be submitted to the IRS on his behalf. Months passed. Communication was sporadic. Eventually, the answer arrived.
The offer was rejected.
The IRS concluded that Mark had the ability to pay his tax debt over time. The medical crisis that caused the problem, the good-faith effort to keep his business alive, and the personal toll the situation had taken were not part of the calculation. The offer failed, the retainer was gone, and the payroll tax liability remained—larger, older, and now more urgent than before.
Mark’s experience illustrates a reality that is rarely explained in tax resolution marketing. These companies suggest that if you owe back taxes, the IRS is willing to negotiate like a credit card company and cut you a deal simply because you’re struggling.
That message is appealing. Unfortunately, it’s also deeply misleading. Here’s how it really works.
An Offer in Compromise (OIC) is a real IRS program. It does allow some taxpayers to settle their tax debt for less than the full amount owed. But the idea that everyone qualifies—or that the IRS routinely accepts lowball offers—is one of the biggest myths in tax resolution.
The IRS Is Not Negotiating on Feelings
One of the most common misconceptions I see is that hardship alone qualifies someone for an Offer in Compromise. People assume that if they’ve had a rough few years, the IRS will meet them halfway.
That’s not how it works.
The IRS does not negotiate based on sympathy, stress, or fairness in the abstract. It negotiates based on math. Very specific math.
At the center of every Offer in Compromise review is a concept most taxpayers have never heard of: Reasonable Collection Potential, or RCP.
What Is Reasonable Collection Potential?
RCP is the IRS’s estimate of how much it believes it can collect from you over time—whether through monthly payments, asset liquidation, or enforced collection if necessary.
In plain terms, the IRS asks:
- How much disposable income do you have each month?
- What assets do you own, and what equity is available?
- How long does the IRS have left to collect?
Your tax balance is not the starting point. Your financial capacity is.
If the IRS believes it can collect the full balance—even slowly—it has no incentive to accept less. That’s true even if paying the debt would be uncomfortable or inconvenient.
Why “Pennies on the Dollar” Is Rare
Here’s a pattern I see repeatedly: a taxpayer owes a large amount—say $150,000. They assume that because the number is big, settlement is inevitable. A marketing firm the taxpayer contacts reinforces that assumption, often before doing any meaningful financial analysis.
But when the actual numbers are reviewed, the picture changes.
Maybe the taxpayer has steady income. Maybe they own a home with equity. Maybe they have retirement accounts or business assets. Maybe their monthly expenses exceed IRS “allowable” standards but not by enough to matter.
When those numbers are plugged into the IRS formula, the RCP comes back close to—or even higher than—the total balance owed.
At that point, an Offer in Compromise is dead on arrival.
Example
Consider a taxpayer with $120,000 in tax debt. On paper, that sounds like an ideal settlement candidate.
But after analysis:
- They earn $110,000 per year
- They own a home with $80,000 in equity
- Their allowable monthly disposable income is $1,200
From the IRS’s perspective, this taxpayer can pay. Maybe not immediately, but over time.
No matter how persuasive the offer narrative is, the IRS will not accept “pennies on the dollar” when its own math shows otherwise.
Why Tax Resolution Advertising Is So Misleading
Many tax resolution firms focus on selling hope, not accuracy. They emphasize the existence of the program without explaining its gatekeeping standards. They talk about success stories without explaining how narrow those cases are.
What they rarely say upfront is this: most Offers in Compromise are rejected.
That’s not because taxpayers did something wrong. It’s because the IRS is applying its formula exactly as designed.
The IRS Doesn’t Bargain—It Calculates
The biggest mental shift taxpayers need to make is this: the IRS is not negotiating in the traditional sense. There is no back-and-forth. There is no “meet in the middle.”
There is an evaluation, a calculation, and a decision.
If your offer is lower than what the IRS believes it can collect, it will be rejected—regardless of how compelling your personal story may be.
Why This Matters
The danger of the “pennies on the dollar” myth isn’t just disappointment. It’s wasted time, wasted money, and lost opportunities for better solutions.
I’ve seen people who could have pursued installment agreements, partial payment plans, or penalty relief—but instead spent months chasing an Offer in Compromise that never had a realistic chance.
An Informed Taxpayer Is a Protected Taxpayer
Offers in Compromise are powerful tools—for the right cases. But they are not universal solutions, and they are not shortcuts.
If there’s one takeaway I want readers to have, it’s this: an Offer in Compromise is not about how much you owe—it’s about what the IRS believes it can collect.
Understanding that distinction protects you from unrealistic promises and helps you approach tax resolution with clarity instead of hope alone.
And when it comes to dealing with the IRS, clarity is always the better strategy.
If you would like clarity on your tax situation, KAC Consulting, Inc. can help!Contact us today for more information.










